This program is tentative and subject to change.
Shallow embeddings that use monads to represent effects are popular in proof-oriented languages because they are convenient for formal verification. Once shallowly embedded programs are verified, they are often extracted to mainstream languages like OCaml or C and linked into larger codebases. The extraction process is not fully verified because it often involves quotation—turning the shallowly embedded program into a deeply embedded one—and verifying quotation remains a major open challenge. Instead, some prior work obtains formal correctness guarantees using translation validation to certify individual extraction results. We build on this idea, but limit the use of translation validation to a first extraction step that we call relational quotation and that uses a metaprogram to construct a typing derivation for the given shallowly embedded program. This metaprogram is simple, since the typing derivation follows the structure of the original program. Once we validate, syntactically, that the typing derivation is valid for the original program, we pass it to a verified syntax-generation function that produces code guaranteed to be semantically related to the original program.
We apply this general idea to build SEIO*, a framework for extracting shallowly embedded F* programs with IO to a deeply embedded 𝜆-calculus while providing formal secure compilation guarantees. Using two cross-language logical relations, we devise a machine-checked proof in F* that SEIO* guarantees Robust Relational Hyperproperty Preservation (RrHP), a very strong secure compilation criterion that implies full abstraction as well as preservation of trace properties and hyperproperties against arbitrary adversarial contexts. This goes beyond the state of the art in verified and certifying extraction, which so far has focused on correctness rather than security.
This program is tentative and subject to change.
Thu 27 AugDisplayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
15:30 - 17:00 | Effects, Semantics, and Program AnalysisICFP Papers at IP126 Auditorium Chair(s): Benjamin Delaware Purdue University | ||
15:30 18mTalk | HMCFA: A Precise and Practical Big-Step Control Flow Analysis for Effect HandlersRemote ICFP Papers | ||
15:48 18mTalk | When Types Intersect and Effects Get Handled ICFP Papers Stefano Catozi LIPN, Ugo Dal Lago University of Bologna & INRIA Sophia Antipolis, Taro Sekiyama National Institute of Informatics | ||
16:06 18mTalk | Demand-on-Demand Control-Flow Analysis ICFP Papers | ||
16:24 18mTalk | Adequacy for Predicate Transformer Semantics ICFP Papers Kazuki Watanabe National Institute of Informatics; SOKENDAI, Mirai Ikebuchi Kyoto University, Mayuko Kori Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University | ||
16:42 18mTalk | Misquoted No More: Securely Extracting F* Programs with IO ICFP Papers Cezar-Constantin Andrici MPI-SP, Abigail Pribisova MPI-SP and MPI-SWS, Danel Ahman University of Tartu, Cătălin Hriţcu MPI-SP, Exequiel Rivas Tallinn University of Technology; Ahrefs, Théo Winterhalter INRIA | ||